Sandy Hook Evidence Fool me Once - 1

Published on March 18th, 2013 | by -swansong-

21

Sandy Hook Official Sources



A quick article today about some of the recent statements and reports being attributed to Sandy Hook Official Sources.

Fool me once, shame on…shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on…uhhh…you can’t get fooled again!

Figure we could fill an entire page, 3000 words or so, with all the baloney that was peddled as truth in the aftermath of Sandy Hook?

Sandy Hook Official Sources

Official sources told us Nancy Lanza was a teacher at SHE. Official sources told us Peter Lanza was shot dead in New Jersey. Official sources told us four hand guns and ONLY hand guns were found in the school. Figure the press learned anything from relying on “official” sources? Apparently not.

A recent article from the NY Daily News provides another example of the lengths to which unscrupulous media organizations will go to further a particular agenda.

Morbid find suggests murder-obsessed gunman Adam Lanza plotted Newtown, Conn.’s Sandy Hook massacre for years

It’s not even as though the author is attempting to hide the fact that the quote is entirely unsubstantiated with no verifiable physical evidence provided. Nope. Not hiding it at all. It’s right underneath the banner.

Law enforcement reportedly discovers a sickeningly thorough 7-foot-long, 4-foot-wide spreadsheet with names, body counts and weapons from previous mass murders and even attempted killings. ‘It sounded like a doctoral thesis, that was the quality of the research,’ an anonymous law enforcement veteran said.

It may be instructive to once again note that the warrants for this investigation are sealed until the end of this month. I’m no legal-eagle but I would think releasing information like this just might be a crime.

I won’t take you through the NYDN article. If you want to read unsubstantiated nonsense I could give you some. I’ve always wanted to try my hand at fiction. Honestly I don’t know what bothers me more, the fact that these “officials” are so spineless that they won’t attach their name to information they feel is so vital it needs to be released regardless of the law, or police officials apparent unwillingness to root these people out and hold them accountable.

This latest article from the News is only that, the latest, in a endless series of unsubstantiated claims seemingly designed to inflame our emotions and manipulate our decision making processes.

A couple of weeks ago the facebook page being maintained for Victoria Soto by her family made such a claim.

soto fb cap

This is why we continue to fight for gun control. This is Vicki’s sisters Carlee is staring at a photo of two little six year old hands from SHS that were blown apart by an assult weapon, she could not take her eyes away knowing this is how those precious children and her sister died. It was not an easy death they did not just die they were shot 3-11 times each. When you vote for your elected officials think of what their stance on guns is, the information is easily available and important for all of us to know. I have the picture of the little hands but won’t post it. Carlee said “that picture will be in my head forever”. I won’t do that to everyone.

I don’t mean to sound unsympathetic but would someone like to tell me how they not only got to see photos of the crime scene and bodies but apparently also got to KEEP some of them??

As a brief yet disturbing aside…I realized this week that were I to do a thorough job of investigating Sandy Hook I would need to access facebook accounts. I had an account…once…2 years ago. I had it for 6 months, didn’t like it, closed it. Actually I thought I had done more than that. I wanted it deleted, cancelled, extinguished. In short, gone.

Yesterday I decided to plug in my email address and password. The entire page popped up just as I’d left it…*shudder*.

Should you have a FB account you can view the Soto page here.

Annnnd….we’re back…

It is these types of continuing “leaks” of information to the public that has caused Lt. Paul Vance to release another statement to the press.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 18, 2013

UPDATE
SANDY HOOK SCHOOL SHOOTING INVESTIGATION

The Connecticut State Police is not releasing further information in regards to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings at this time.

The recent seminar during which the Newtown case was discussed was designed for law enforcement professionals only. Law enforcement sensitive information was discussed dealing with tactical operational approaches employed by first responders on the day of the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Officer safety and public safety along with lessons learned from the incident were discussed. Following each tragic mass murder incident in this country it is customary for law enforcement to share their lessons learned from the investigation so that other law enforcement agencies can learn.

The Connecticut State Police has not and will not speak publicly on the Sandy Hook investigation, as it is still ongoing and it is the policy of the State Police that no factual information will be distributed until the families of the victims have been informed first. The families of the victims continue to be a priority in this investigation and this fact was clearly stated at the seminar. It is unfortunate that someone in attendance chose not to honor Colonel Stebbins’ request to respect the families’ right to know specifics of the investigation first.

It is anticipated that the final Connecticut State Police report is still several months away. No additional info is available regarding this case.

-end-

Lt. J. Paul Vance

The first bolded area was a surprise to me…”no factual information will be distributed until the families of the victims have been informed first”.

To be honest, I’ve often wondered over these last 3 months if any factual information was going to be released AT ALL.

The second bolded area clearly alludes to someone sharing information they shouldn’t have. Since it seems to have happened recently and suggests it hadn’t already been released to the families, I’m going to go with the NYDN article.

Someone did it. They know it was done. They know where it was done. I’ll assume the reporter is being water-boarded as we speak.

Since it’s what brought me to writing this article today it’s only fair I go back to the NYDN article to tee up my closing.

What investigators found was a chilling spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide that required a special printer, a document that contained Lanza’s obsessive, extensive research — in nine-point font — about mass murders of the past, and even attempted murders.

But it wasn’t just a spreadsheet. It was a score sheet.

“We were told (Lanza) had around 500 people on this sheet,” a law enforcement veteran told me Saturday night. “Names and the number of people killed and the weapons that were used, even the precise make and model of the weapons. It had to have taken years. It sounded like a doctoral thesis, that was the quality of the research.”

This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.

Pretty strong stuff. I mean, it would be, if it wasn’t a pile of unsubstantiated blather. If it required a special printer we’ll be getting the name of the place/person that facilitated this printing, yes?

The work of a video gamer? Quite an avid one it would appear. We’ll be getting some verification of an online footprint that corresponds with this obsessive gaming, yes?

connie sullivan

Just after reading that NYDN article I went back to examining some info I had dug up about some Sandy Hook teachers. I’ll get more into it in future articles but for now suffice to say I found that the only Connie Sullivan, who is a 4th grade teacher at SHE, (Constance Sullivan) listed in the CT teacher Certificate database had a license that expired in 1999.

I went looking farther and found the Linkedin account of a Connie Sullivan working as Property Leader at General Electric Headquarters…lol…I know, eh?

Next I decide to do a search for any Vollmers on Linkedin. The very first one that pops up is Vollmer Public Relations with offices in Dallas, Austin and NYC.

Is it the same family? Don’t know. just found it today. It is interesting that Scott Vollmer, Janet Vollmer’s (SHE kindergarten teacher) son worked in a PR capacity for Mayor Bloomberg.

I tell ya. Some days it’s awfully hard to keep track of the players without a scorecard.

You know what a guy really needs?

A banner. About 7 feet long and 4 feet wide.

-swansong-

Tags: , , ,


About the Author

Is just a guy...sick of the lies. A guy who is sick of the constant manipulating, spinning, massaging, altering, sensationalizing and outright bastardizing of the news. There's a reason they're called the "public" airwaves. They belong to us...and it's time we took them back.





21 Responses to Sandy Hook Official Sources

  1. RealPerson says:

    Whoa….rather than a spreadsheet, perhaps knee high boots would help, because wading through the BS gets deeper every time an “official source” offers information.

  2. bryan eddy says:

    LOL.my thoughts exactly!

    Lets see if I follow this see b.s. report.We are to believe,a mildly retarded,heavily sedated 90 pound weakling ,was too brilliant for the feds ,and completely destroyed all of his digital devices

    leaving no traceable data trail on hard drives,but forgot to throw away his 28 foot Office depot ,white, planner board with Side Show Bob, crazy kill Bart manifesto?And this we only learn about 3 months later?

    I agree this little misanthrope was cunning and guile enough to breach a state-of-the-art security system ,replete with bullet proof entry area,camera monitored,voice recording (a letter was sent to parents months before ,boasting of the systems installment,I read it)and not be recorded .at least not that we’ve seen.

    Entering the school and doing his heinous act on innocent children ,one actual calendar day AFTER his own state registered death.Using 2, I mean, 3.. I mean 4.. I mean only pistols ,I’m sorry, all rifle shots,no.. that was in the car.I’m sorry ,you see .the school was surrounded by swat,military,police,state troopers,Bruce Willis,the national guard,a thousand unused EMTs so forgive me if details are a little sketchy.

    People still awake ,and mildly in charge of your own faculties..please open your eyes to the fact that our next battle,after the revolution this administration is creating ,will be AGAINST this complicit MEDIA who stand before you and out and out lie.

    DEMAND THE TRUTH ,or stay stupid.

    • -swansong- says:

      Lmao…Bravo.

      What a positively perceptive point about taking the time to smash the hard drive but leave the banner in tact. And people believe this stuff. Wow…just wow.

      • SEO says:

        I had had the exact same thought about the hard drive, which was so completely destroyed there was nothing they could do to retrieve data, yet he leaves papers for them to find.
        Also, if you go back to Andrea McCarren’s twitter feed from either Dec 14 or 15, she tweets twice that “officials” found information on the computers at the Lanza’s home (it has been a while since I looked at those tweets, so I am going on memory, but this was apparently information she was getting real time).

  3. Bittercritter says:

    It took them 3 months to create a 7 x 3 banner and manufacture a motive. Now Nancy Lanza is part of the plot by making straw purchases for her son (she couldn’t deny him anything!). “Oh, honey, you want some big guns so you can shoot up an elementary school?” Uh-huh.
    FPS video games and plastic on windows makes every kid in a trailer park a future mass murderer.
    Classic ending line there Swansong! Nice work.

    • -swansong- says:

      Thanks, Bro 🙂 Much appreciated.

      Glad to see you haven’t forgotten about us. We’d still love to see you over here. If you happen to do skype, we’re doing that now so it makes conversing much easier.

      At least drop in and shoot the breeze when you have a little time.

  4. exceld says:

    The assault rifle that Nancy Lanza supposedly purchased for her son is illegal in CT. How could she have lawfully purchased an illegal weapon?

  5. Pilot says:

    I don’t know how anyone can swallow this garbage. Thanks for the quickie swansong. ; )

  6. M. William says:

    New Haven lawyer Irving Pinsky has dropped his $100 million law suit against the state of Connecticut, claiming he needed to evaluate new evidence in the matter. Pinsky was suing Connecticut on behalf of a 6-year-old student at Sandy Hook Elementary, who was allegedly “traumatized” by hearing violent screams and gun shots over the school’s intercom system.

    According to the original complaint, the Board of Education, Department of Education and state Education Commissioner were at fault for failing to protect the child “from foreseeable harm” by not providing a safe school setting. The suit also alleged each of the responsible parties did not review annual school profile reports as well as “other submissions with respect to student safety and emergency response planning and protocol.” It claimed the parties did not require the school and local Board of Education to implement an effective emergency response plan.

    Pinsky said although he is dropping this suit, he is not ruling out other legal action in the future.

    State Attorney General George Jepsen said Pinsky’s suit was “misguided” and indicated the solution to violent crime would be in legislative action, rather than legal action.

    “Our hearts go out to this family, and to all the children and families affected by the Newtown shootings,” Jepsen said in a statement. “They deserve a thoughtful and deliberate examination of the causes of this tragedy and of the appropriate public policy responses.”

    Jepsen indicated that Pinsky’s suit wouldn’t have been successful, even if it had continued forward. “Although the investigation is still under way, we are aware of no facts or legal theory under which the state of Connecticut should be liable for causing the harms inflicted at Sandy Hook Elementary School,” he said. © 2013 Mediaite, LLC

    1. Inadequate security at school entrance; teacher doesn’t have a key; doors only lock with a key…
    2. 20 min. response time for law enforcement to arrive at school
    3. EMT kept away “…at the fire station”
    4. No medical emergency evacuation of victims via ambulance or helicopters; except apparently only two according to “official sources”
    5. Ambulances blocked in/out by vehicles
    6. Perps father is a high up executive at General Electric..making a lucrative salary no doubt
    7. Perps mother has no gun safe or any secure storage for firearms (with a stipend of reportedly a $200,000+…she couldn’t afford a gun safe)

    …on and on and on…

    Maybe it’s too early to conclude, but…

    NO LAW SUITS= NO VICTIMS

  7. M. William says:

    Oh, and why no lawsuits against Bushmaster, Glock, and Sig Sauer, those are always a given in these circumstances. Certainly an attorney could find a sympathetic jury now that we are being told the public mood has changed with regards to gun-control…

  8. PCGeek says:

    The defining issues that without a doubt prove complicity in this hoax are :

    1. Lack of any TRUE emotion at the crime scene and in the immediate aftermath.

    2. The immediate gun control mantra portrayed by ALL supposed victim families.

    3. The lack of emergency response to supposedly mortally shot victims… Had it been real more than an army of personnel would have attempted recusitation at some level and there should have been more than a few EMT helicopters landing to do everything possible to save even just one life.

    All the other obvious photoshop name changing and fabrications , which incidently have been proven over and over are important, but focussing on the common sense reactions that SHOULD have occurred are paramount to persuading the sheeples of the world to actually take this seriously.

    • Caitlin says:

      Lack of true emotion, you say?

      Well, would you want to be seen having a mental breakdown on National Television? Surely not.

  9. Mona Pressley says:

    I have done research on various sites that tell you where people live and have lived and relatives they are associated with and some of these people involved do not live or have never lived in Sandy Hook or the areas around there. Also the resemblance of some of the characters like the McDonnell woman match to another person that is a volunteer at the fire department. The photo shop work doesnt cover up everything and it is obvious they are the same person. One other thing I found is Dawn Hochsprungs real name is Janet Hochsprung who was married to George. There are so many odd facts that discredit the entire Sandy Hook Hoax it is unbelievable. These people involved for their gun grabbing agenda should be brought up on charges,

    • Caitlin says:

      If I may ask,
      Where did you find that people were living? There are a lot of teachers in Newtown that don’t live in Newtown. If you take a look at Newtown’s geographical location, you may notice that it is extremely close to New York. In fact, lots of people live in Newtown actually work in New York because it is so close.

      But still, where did you find where people were living?

      Also, Newtown schools, on multiple websites, have been ranked quite well. Keep that in mind.

  10. M. William says:

    Correction: New information from unsealed warrants show a gun safe was present in the home and, apparently, Adam Lanza had access to the safe.

  11. Caitlin says:

    Ok, have you considered the viewpoint, possibly, of a graduate of that school? Maybe a child who knew Mrs. Vollmer or actually had Connie Sullivan as a 3rd grade teacher (yes, she taught third grade)? One who actually saw friends die? One whose mother went to several funerals?

    What you are doing here, in this article, sir, is taking what has been giving to you and manipulating it. Also, when you search things, do you think that maybe you’re not actually finding relevant information to the situation?

    And do you really think the government would stage the death of children so people would listen to them? That is something I think only a terrorist group would resort to.

    You may have heard of Charlotte Bacon, one of the victims. Her older brother, Guy, is in my home room class. Ever since the incident, he doesn’t talk much in class. He always has his hood up.

    And my friend’s younger brother actually got his stuffed animal shot by the deranged man who attacked the school. He and others almost had to run underneath him so they could escape the classroom.

    Also, if this was all a setup, any young child on the news probably would have spilled it in some way or form.

    You haven’t considered the other perspective of the story.

    Sincerely,
    ~Caitlin
    Newtown Student

    • -swansong- says:

      “And do you really think the government would stage the death of children so people would listen to them? That is something I think only a terrorist group would resort to.”

      Yes, I do…and yes, they are.

      Not only do I think they would stage the death of children to further an agenda,,,I think they would actually murder children to accomplish the same goal. Do you think your government only murders (and supports those that murder) brown children?

      1 million Iraqi children died while Iraq was suffering under US sanctions. You think they really care about 20 American kids? How many children in your own country live in abject poverty…without even clean water to drink while your government spends trillions on it’s war machine?

      Btw…nowhere on this blog does it say no children died. This blog exists, in part, to examine the aspects of this event that the media and families seem all too willing to ignore.

      Your vision of America, while touching, is deeply separated from reality. I’m afraid you are going to be in for a rude awakening as you get older.

      But I thank you for your polite questions and comments.

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑