Sandy Hook Investigation The real sandy hook stalkers

Published on November 17th, 2014 | by -swansong-

43

The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers



In this article titled The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers we will examine increasingly inflammatory claims by Sandy Hook supporters and compare them to the reality they seem so willing to insult.

Many details of the story surrounding Sandy Hook have changed over time. One of the few things that have remained consistent is the opposition to the investigation. Many websites and discussion forums have limited discussion on this topic and others have chosen to go as far as employing covert operatives to derail discussions and levelling lifetime bans to anyone who dares to ask questions or comment on the events in Sandy Hook.

Forum Shill gets Busted: ATS and GLP Censor to Cover his Tracks

While certainly not new, these tactics have been ramped up exponentially in the aftermath of Sandy Hook. Those of us who have taken it upon ourselves to research and discuss this and similar events have been dealing with this type of assault for quite some time. What we aren’t used to is what’s come next.

The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers

There is an oft used debate tactic by those without sufficient evidence or intellectual substance to support their position. It falls under the category of “Logical Fallacies”.

 

Pot meets kettle

 

From Wikipedia

As generally understood, the person accusing (the “pot”) is understood to share some quality with the target of their accusation (the “kettle”). The pot is mocking the kettle for a little soot when the pot itself is thoroughly covered in it.

An alternative interpretation, recognized by some, but not all, sources is that the pot is sooty (being placed on a fire), while the kettle is clean and shiny (being placed on coals only), and hence when the pot accuses the kettle of being black, it is the pot’s own sooty reflection that it sees: the pot accuses the kettle of a fault that only the pot has, rather than one that they share.

As a diversionary tactic, this form of Logical Fallacy can be very effective, since the accuser is put on the defensive, and frequently feels compelled to defend against the accusation.

stalking

Not only do “they” gleefully use the Logical Fallacy tactic, they use it in the most vile and reprehensible way possible. Terms like “stalker” and “predator” litter their discourse often followed or preceded by mention of children.

We at Insanemedia are no strangers to these tactics and have wasted some energy combatting them. That stops today…and here’s why.

Last night I had occasion to watch an episode of Canada’s award winning investigative news program, The Fifth Estate. The topic of the program was Amanda Todd. In case you’re not familiar with that name or the circumstances surrounding this 15 year old girl’s life and death…by her own hand…I would invite you to view the episode.

Within the 40+ minutes you will come to learn exactly what stalking, harassment, bullying and predation really are. When you’re done you should have a profound new sense of revulsion for the people that would attempt to pervert this very real and despicable criminal act into something used to intimidate and frighten free thinkers.

 



 

Now that you’ve watched the program and seen what real predation looks like, and it’s tragic consequences, let’s compare them to what Sandy Hook Supporters consider “stalking”.

stalking nov 11
stalking 2 nov 11

 

The above comment was posted in a closed FaceBook group where members must be approved prior to joining. The comment was made in this closed group, to other like minded souls, for purposes of discussion. No more…no less. This is what passes for “stalking” in the world of these deluded degenerates.

The person who screencapped this comment used an alternate FaceBook profile to literally infiltrate and lurk in the group for the purposes of sharing the info found. The author then goes on, without the slightest hint of irony, (or likely even the ability to spell it), to repost commentary from this closed group on their own blog.

 

stalking 3 nov 11

 

The notion…the mere suggestion…that a conversation in a closed group between consenting adults is somehow akin to the abuse and torture Amanda Todd, and others like her have experienced, is a most vicious and demeaning form of hyperbole.

But it doesn’t stop there. These are just a few examples…a tiny fraction…of the inflammatory rhetoric used to intimidate researchers and demean the victims of actual crime.

 

stalking 2

Sandy Hook Stalkers

Sandy Hook Stalkers 2

 

And again…the above author seems perfectly oblivious to the fact that he’s the pot and we’re the kettle. In reality he’s not at all oblivious. He knows precisely what he’s doing. They all do.

 

stalking 3

 

To be honest I’m not entirely sure how one would go about “stalking” a grave site but it doesn’t really matter since no one has actually done such a thing.  That’s beside the point though because the point isn’t protecting families it’s limiting discussion….censorship.

Obama Confidant’s Spine-Chilling Proposal

Cass Sunstein wants the government to “cognitively infiltrate” anti-government groups

In 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Sunstein co-wrote a truly pernicious paper proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites — as well as other activist groups — which advocate views that Sunstein deems “false conspiracy theories” about the Government. This would be designed to increase citizens’ faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists.

Sunstein advocates that the Government’s stealth infiltration should be accomplished by sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups.” He also proposes that the Government make secret payments to so-called “independent” credible voices to bolster the Government’s messaging (on the ground that those who don’t believe government sources will be more inclined to listen to those who appear independent while secretly acting on behalf of the Government).

Is there any better way to undermine someone’s credibility than accusing them of being a vile criminal? The danger, of course, is that if the smears don’t have the intended effect efforts must be ramped up. So come the threats.

 

cw wade threats

Johnson threat

Keith Johnson Threat

 

“Cyber-stalker”, “preys on children”. This is the same person who earlier sided with a man “whose life had nearly been ruined by false rumors spread about him on the internet”.

These next examples are hot off the presses.

 

mike allen - 5

Mike Allen - 6

The above FaceBook post has to do with a person who has recently been calling homes and businesses in Newtown and asking them their opinion on the events in Sandy Hook. As you can see in the comments, while I don’t necessarily agree with this particular endeavor (precisely because of the impression it gives) I also would not consider it harassment.

That being said, videos of this type, posted by this person, are removed from the FaceBook groups of which I am an administrator. Furthermore the overwhelming opinion of the members of those groups is that the videos should be removed and this person should cease their efforts to contact people from Newtown.

The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers

The truly astonishing thing about all this is that not only do they spread rumors, make outlandish claims, threaten us and accuse us of being criminal stalkers…but they do this while they are LITERALLY stalking us.

 

Fique stalking

 

“The recent CLOSED GROUP member’s list leak”. Someone posing as a sincere researcher infiltrated our closed FaceBook group and took copies of the details of each and every member within and posted it online for the world to see. Not satisfied with that they also skulk in the group and copy all posts and comments which they then repost.

 

Michael Flagg Stalker

 

You might be wondering what they then do with all this personal information. Well, they use it to find out as much as they can about a given person, whomever happens to be on their radar on any given day, and they begin contacting that person’s family…their place of employment…their child’s school to tell them all what a heinous and despicable person s/he is.

Everyday the list of people affected by these tactics grows longer. The latest involved a woman from our closed group who had segments of comments she made, along with proof of her membership, sent to her daughter’s school by Ryan Graney. Who is she, you ask?

 

Ryan Graney Stalker

 

And what were the comments that were so heinous that Ms. Graney felt it necessary to insert herself into the private life of this woman and her child by screencapping them and forwarding them to the girls school?

Ed note: The woman’s name and the name of her daughter’s school have been blacked out by me.

 

SHHG1

SHHG2

 

Yes…that’s right. This woman had the temerity to state an opinion in a closed group with which Ryan Graney, disguised as another persona, apparently disagreed. Graney’s solution to this difference of opinion was to try, in some small way, to ruin this woman’s life.

As with many of us involved in this she is not one to be pushed around. She has filed a police report on this matter. Should SWAT kick down Graney’s door we’ll let you know.

Make no mistake, this is only the LATEST in an ever growing list of such abuses. Many other tactics are also being used in the fight to silence discussion and debate.

Recently, emails bearing my name, have been sent out to people who had, in the recent past, experienced the tragic loss of a family member. A man who lost his brother to a heart attack…a man who lost his son to a car accident…and a woman that lost her mother and son in a very short period of time.

I will not repeat the comments here but suffice to say those that received emails were ridiculed, accused of being liars and their loved ones were mocked and maligned. They also used this tactic to email our web host to try and discover the server log-in details for this site.

It’s worth noting that every one of the people posting these comments online have, or do, congregate at a certain FaceBook page. Amongst the commenters at this page, associating with these cretinous rejects, are the likes of Leonard Pozner. “Lenny” is the father of Noah Pozner an alleged victim of the events in Sandy Hook.

Lenny seems to have his own area of focus amongst the harassers. Lenny trolls YouTube and files copyright complaints on as many videos as he can under the umbrella of The Honr Network. I find the non-traditional spelling of “honor” to be highly appropriate.

 

YouTube Copyright

 

Fortunately for Lenny, YouTube’s copyright reporting policy is an automated one. If you make a claim against a particular video it is assumed you have the rights for some or all of it and as such the video is immediately removed. Should you wish to challenge the claimed copyright you must file a legal counterclaim.

This counterclaim contains all your personal information including name and address.

I filed a counterclaim against the 2 videos mentioned above. Lenny never challenged my counterclaim and the videos are back online…but what he did do was take the personal information on that counterclaim and began circulating it to people in his cabal.

I began getting personal messages on FaceBook, from people whom Lenny thinks he can trust, informing me of his efforts to “out” me. It really is a win/win for Lenny and his group. If one chooses not to counterclaim the video is gone, and after 3 strikes, so is your entire channel. Or, should you choose to counterclaim, Lenny, with the help of his attack dogs, has all the information he needs to track you…your family…and your employer.

 

The Honr Network

To bring awareness to Hoaxer activity and to criminally and/or civilly prosecute those who wittingly and publicly defame, harass, and emotionally abuse the victims of high profile tragedies and/or their family members. We intend to hold such abusers personally accountable for their actions, in whatever capacity the law allows.

Do you think it’s a coincidence that the only victims of defamation, harassment and abuse they seem concerned about are those who have been “victims of high profile tragedies”? We can assume everyone else is fair game.

 

The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers

Now…in the interest of full disclosure…comments similar in tone and style to the ones forwarded in those emails I mentioned are made everyday in FaceBook groups and on discussion forums all over the internet. That’s true. They are also often directed at the families of the Sandy Hook Event. While I am not in favor of making categorical statements about, or accusations towards, the participants in this event, I will say that there is a world of difference between carrying on a discussion with others who share your interest, and reaching out and contacting participants directly.

One participant that doesn’t agree, and who also hangs his hat at the aforementioned FaceBook page, is Tom Bittman. Bittman is one of the co-founders of Sandy Hook Promise. In a recent FaceBook conversation (that Mr. Bittman chose to delete prior to my being able to screencap it) he mentioned the case of a “friend”, a parent of a child from Sandy Hook Elementary. This parent was devastated to learn of the discussions going on in our closed FaceBook group.

How did she find out about these discussions? Well…her “friend”, Tom Bittman, told her about them and directed her to the group. At that point, I assume, she created a fake profile, joined the group and had her heart broken.

How dare we shove our thoughts in their faces like that!

 

Hypocrite

 

We are not heartless beasts. We can sympathize with the pain reading comments like that might cause to someone who lost a loved one to violent crime. But I’m left to wonder…if Tom Bittman had directed that mother to my home and found me discussing that topic at my dinner table…would he and his co-horts demand an end to that, as well?

The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers

Insanemedia has never, in it’s 2 years online, contacted a Sandy Hook Event family member, harassed anyone, made claims it couldn’t substantiate, claimed no one died or disseminated any information it knew to not be true.

But make NO mistake, when these fascists say they want people to stop harassing Sandy Hook families, they mean us as much as anyone else. God knows they’ve tried, in the last year especially, to browbeat and intimidate us into closing up shop and moving on. So far they’ve only succeeded in pissing us off. And what’s pissing me off today is the callousness and vitriol with which they demean and lessen the suffering of actual victims of crime with their manufactured disdain and propagandized delivery.

In a future article we’ll take the time to delve into the backgrounds of some of these righteous defenders of virtue and liberty, but for now, I would simply ask you to remember the story of Amanda Todd. Remember the literally millions like her who have been the victims of actual stalking and harassment. Then ask yourself…

…if Sandy Hook happened…as stated…why do these people feel the need to obfuscate, malign, degrade, conceal, lie, threaten and attack in an effort to keep us from discussing it? Why does the FBI need to redact over 60 pages of their investigation? Why haven’t we seen an autopsy photo of Adam Lanza? Something…anything that might help to answer some of the 100s of nagging questions and anomalies surrounding this event.

Frighteningly the real question for me is…when they realize that the threats and abuse aren’t going to have the desired effect…what might they be willing to do next?

Stay tuned…

~swansong~

Your thoughts and comments are always welcome so tell us what you think about The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers. Anything in there that surprised you? Who do you think is being harassed?

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

Is just a guy...sick of the lies. A guy who is sick of the constant manipulating, spinning, massaging, altering, sensationalizing and outright bastardizing of the news. There's a reason they're called the "public" airwaves. They belong to us...and it's time we took them back.





43 Responses to The REAL Sandy Hook Stalkers

  1. Mike Sea says:

    They can’t stop the truth and they will no stop us. For every channel they take down 3 will better channels will arise. For every blogger they stop through intimidation, 3 reinvigorated writers will emerge that will reach ten times more readers. They can knock off ten Sandy Hook Activists and 100 more will spring up, all of them more willing, more ready to battle the lies and reveal the truth. The good people who know the truth will never stop sharing it, ever.

  2. John says:

    Thank you, Swan, for this thorough and intelligent article. I’m of the mind that there is a multi-sided attack on ANYONE who questions the “official” Sandy Hook Elementary school narrative. We live in a world that has not taken lightly to those who question those in power. What we are seeing now which you have articulated so well, is a ramped up attack on all fronts by those who are protecting their own interests, often under the guise of morality and honor. Ironic, isn’t it?

    You have your CW Wades, Keith Johnsons and Lenny Pozners and Tom Bittmans…. all who profess to be on the side of truth who continually demonstrate through their deceitful words and actions that they are certainly no better than the people they claim top oppose. I especially find Tom Bittman’s actions even more deplorable than the others. Here’s my question to Tom: Why, in God’s name, would you direct a parent of an alleged victim to a sight that you, yourself, thought was so deplorable? You’re supposed to be an intelligent human being, Tom. You had to know that just the idea of even telling this parent about something you yourself thought to be so vile would cause severe mental anguish, no? Is that the purpose of the Sandy Hook Promise group you co-founded? Help to disturb these “victims” even more, so you can justify the “work” that your group is doing?

    And, if Tom is listening (and even if he isn’t, I’m sure someone else from the “watch group” is and will let Tom know about this), what’s up with your fellow SHP co-founder Rob Cox? Just four days after the SH event, Cox used his Wall Street Journal forum to write a detailed article about “the tragedy” (his words) and closed the piece with this: “Did the law, and our Constitution, make this massacre easier to carry out?” I’d love to hear a detailed explanation about that line, Tom.

    Their agenda has become clearer and clearer, Swan. Gun grab, much more sinister mental health requirements and stipulations and, even more ominous, a measuring stick of the ability and the desire of the American people to perceive the “presented” reality. It’s a serious game and these stalkers you’ve revealed are the pawns on the chessboard.

    Continue the good fight….

  3. Zephyr says:

    Great piece as always, @swansong. Personally, I’m finding Facebook to be an all-but-useless forum for serious discussion on any topic, let alone Sandy Hook. Time to return to blogs such as Insane Media et al for real discourse, methinks.

  4. Kelley says:

    You are an exceptional writer. I Love to read your stuff.

  5. SaraSong says:

    Phenomenal piece, as always!!! Thank you for being our voice and bringing light to the disturbing things being done to so many people. You rock 😉

    • -swansong- says:

      Why thank you, stranger 🙂

      Yeah…these people are vile. Someone needed to say something. I’m just glad it could be us.

  6. PCGeek says:

    The whole Sandy Hook Hoax is so obvious that anyone who thinks it actually happened after looking at the facts likely has the attention span of a retarded mosquito.

    IF it actually happened …. then criminal negligence causing death charges should have been laid against all first responders who failed to attempt immediate first aid, cpr or any basic life saving techniques which they are trained and obligated to do.

    The fact that zero parents or family members did not question this gross negligence causing death only proves that it was a hoax. Lt Vance should be swinging by a rope for treason over this escapade. And all the parents should be locked up for treason also …. call a spade a spade, but treason is still treason.

  7. Neffy says:

    Of course the hoaxers cry that they are the victims here while they completely invalidate the suffering of the REAL victims by “just asking questions” like “why did none of the parents cry?” when they know this is false, and make up great examples of fake evidence like falsified FEMA documents and that faked Flexfit email. But of course they are the true victims here. Cry me a river.

  8. CR says:

    sorry bout my lousy keyboard and not looking before I posted.
    Fetzer’s articles are thorough and he is a big supporter or Wolfgang Halbig who’s done a lot of in- your- face investigation – and run into more dead ends non-answers and evasion, even death threats…

  9. A guy with questions and doubts. says:

    A big portion of why there is such a rabid response against people who disagree with the official narrative over the events at Sandy Hook is the entire situation pushes soooo many ‘hot button’ topics…. school shooting, dead little innocent children, possible ‘crazy’ person, anti-gun/violence people, small town (innocent again) America and so on and so on.
    It truly reads like a laundry list of ‘what horrible thing can happen that will disgust even the most hard hearted’, thunk up by an almost terrorist like mindset and then spewed into everyone’s living room like a gala event. It could have been made truly horrible (or tragi-comedic) if you added a blood soaked, arsenic laced apple pie thrown in a G.I.’s face by a Nazi wearing a hajib.
    I personally think something about the whole situation didn’t smell right from the get go…. with the lack of REAL footage of any kind of tragedy actually happening (no response crews, no evacuating kids, no absolutely horrified parents breaking down like you would expect… the list is very long) with the absolute kicker being, get ready, in the land of the free, the home of the brave and the bulwark of the litigious… out of the twenty odd families, NOT ONE FILED A LAWSUIT!! in a country where if you spill coffee on yourself you go to court, not ONE single person claimed any kind of wrongdoing or mismanagement of this whole situation against any of the various authorities with insanely deep pockets involved.
    That is something I find truly unbelievable!

  10. My favorite line is “attention span of a retarded mosquito” Great work Swan.

    • Zephyr says:

      Having become dimly aware they were compared to SHAANBots, a small detachment of differently-abled mosquitoes is filing for defamation as we speak.

    • -swansong- says:

      Truth is this article was originally supposed to be about folks like you…the ones on YT getting shit hammered everyday. Then it took on a life of it’s own and it became about all of us.

      Make no mistake tho…you were one of the people in my mind as I was writing it.

  11. Lenpoz says:

    Thank you for educating people on how to take down more trashy YT videos

  12. Egyptian Princess says:

    Truth will prevail. 9/11….Sandy….Boston….Ebola….

  13. Kelley says:

    Ok, I will, contacting him now and forwarding this instant!

  14. John says:

    I’m “seeing something, so I’m saying something”

    Here’s an example of Tom Bittman, Co-Founder of Sandy Hook Promise, using his Twitter account to do the very thing he supposedly deplores:

    Tom Bittman @tombitt · Nov 14
    If you see something, say something. Well, I see mentally deranged, hateful people revictimizing Sandy Hook. Calling 1000s of people liars.

    Tom Bittman @tombitt · Nov 11
    Sick people think Sandy Hook School shooting was a hoax. Sicker people threatening our kids. Newtown HS in lock-down today due to threat.

    Tom Bittman @tombitt · Oct 1
    Bomb scare at Sandy Hook School, evac and early dismissal. Prob a hoaxer who thinks threatening children with bombs is what a patriot does.
    0 replies 2 retweets 0 favorites
    Reply Retweet2 Favorite

    I guess Tom isn’t really all that sincere about practicing the pledge that he and the rest of all the Sandy Hook Promisers supposedly follow: “we choose love, belief, and hope instead of anger.”

  15. Pingback: The REAL Sandy Hook “Stalkers” | Disaster Response Team of America

  16. Zephyr says:

    Unbelievable. The report extolls the vital necessity identifying and intervening with children who have psychological disabilities, raving about how critical it is that whether their parents agree or not, these children MUST receive regular treatment by professionals including psychiatrists. It then bluntly admits that Adam Lanza’s psychiatrist destroyed all the child’s records and was fired for having sexual relations with his patients.

    • -swansong- says:

      They also make it perfectly clear that while it seems everybody dropped the ball with this kid…none of it can be shown to be responsible for his eventual actions. Lmao…so…while everyone is guilty…no one is responsible.

      • Zephyr says:

        Exactly. Not to mention that most towns would be incredibly grateful for 1) the significant effort of the school administration, 2) the significant involvement of a parent, and 3) the significant involvement of multiple psychiatric professionals. The care this individual allegedly received goes above and beyond anything that could possibly be expected in most towns. To say anyone could have done anything more is ridiculous. All this nonsense is just 3+ factions vying for litigation footing, imo. And now Sandy Hook Promise is weighing in with the “it was preventable” garbage. But hey–if all this finally topples the bizarre Claims Commissioner office, I’m all for it.

  17. absmover says:

    This is called gang stalking

  18. Will Munny says:

    I’ve seen Keith Johnson’s act before on other sites. What an ass-clown. “Vultures” and “predators.” Another favorite of theirs is “ghouls.” The shills and trolls always come out on Sandy Hook discussions. I’ve noticed more comments and posts on this subject disappear more than any other topic. Hmmmm. I wonder how that can be?

    What REAL person would seek out all discussions on a subject for the sole purpose to launch ad hominem attacks?

  19. The Sandy Hook crowd and all their various fringe have fictitious identities, histories and public record was fabricated to suit the various personas. Our government including the US Congress is involved. Our country is infiltrated at every level of government and so is the private sector. Marysville shows a town completed infiltrated and it extends to even the county sheriff; none of these people are who they say they are and the same for Sandy Hook. I will give a couple of examples.

    Bardens – https://twitter.com/rebelready/status/545241238056599554

    The Sandy Hook Teachers – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5Eywp_CIAA2sxM.jpg:large

    Shannon Watts – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5EU6sWCAAAkloY.jpg:large

    D’Avino plus – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B42IKaGCcAAHumF.jpg:large

    Soto – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5BwN1rCIAEkXwS.jpg:large
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5EJ5NSCAAAL9PE.jpg:large

    Review the photo/video line @rebelready to see them all

    • lynda311 says:

      The Soto siblings are played by real life cousins, Emily Sexton aka Carlee, daughter of the FAKE Laura and Nick Phelps (Jennifer Greenberg Sexton and Richard Sexton,) and Brett Greenberg plays Carlos. Brett’s real life little sister, plays “Jillian.”

  20. Becca says:

    Every time Noah Pozner dies, I feel bad — until I realize that boy keeps dying all over the world, at different “school shootings.”
    http://i.imgur.com/5CdbigK.jpg
    Noah Pozner died at Sandy Hook (Newtown CT), then died AGAIN in Pakistan.
    http://i.imgur.com/jHYrjeL.jpg
    If Lenny Pozner took better care of Noah, perhaps Noah would stop dying so often. I wonder what Veronique Pozner (the “mother”) thinks of her son dying every 2 years.
    http://i.imgur.com/8W0vkMd.jpg
    Is Veronique Pozner (Diplomat attached to Embassy of Switzerland in DC) pushing some kind of UN Agenda 21 Gun Control scam?
    http://i.imgur.com/nHWCMeS.jpg

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑